Rolando ‘Rolly’ Romero, known for his straightforward demeanor, has laid down a gauntlet of criticism regarding the impending clash between Terence Crawford and Canelo Alvarez set for September 13th. He claims that Crawford stands little chance against the reigning three-belt champion Canelo, citing a glaring discrepancy in size and power. The dynamic matchup, in Rolly’s eyes, signifies not just a physical challenge but a financial one for Crawford, whom he views as an opportunist cashing in rather than a challenger aiming for legacy.
Romero’s comments draw attention to an undeniable truth: the stark contrast in weight and experience between the two fighters. Canelo, a well-established super middleweight powerhouse, has seamlessly transitioned through the ranks, while Crawford is making what many perceive as a desperate leap up from welterweight. Speaking candidly, Rolly noted that if Crawford were genuinely interested in a legacy-driven fight, he would have sought preliminary bouts in the new weight class. Instead, his decision to dive straight into a bout with a fighter as formidable as Canelo seems influenced by the lure of a financial windfall.
Discussing Crawford’s previous performance—specifically in his debut at junior middleweight—Rolly couldn’t help but highlight what he believes to be Crawford’s vulnerabilities. Against Israil Madrimov, Crawford displayed signs of susceptibility that would be alarming against a fighter of Canelo’s caliber. If Crawford struggled to absorb the punches from Madrimov, Rolly postulates, how would he fare facing the thunderous punches from a Canelo who has only grown stronger and more refined over the years?
Rolly did not shy away from referencing the past, particularly the 2013 bout between Canelo and Floyd Mayweather Jr. In his view, the current iteration of Canelo is not only a vastly improved fighter but also someone who has gained wisdom from every loss and victory. It’s difficult to see how Crawford, a smaller man with less experience against heavy hitters, could employ the same strategies that allowed Mayweather to secure a win. Romero’s assertion that Crawford is effectively out of his league cannot be overlooked; it’s a valid point that speaks to experience and the cumulation of heavy-hitting encounters.
The conversation surrounding Crawford’s ambition raises a fundamental question: Is he fighting for legacy, or is this bout more about realizing financial goals? Rolly fears that Crawford’s motivations lean towards the latter, a concern shared by many boxing fans who appreciate the sport’s rich history for titanic battles fought in pursuit of glory. The steep monetary stakes could overshadow the sport’s competitive essence, transforming what could be a celebrated event into a simple financial transaction. This perspective taps into a broader narrative within boxing, where the allure of huge paychecks sometimes overshadows the traditionally rugged chase for honor and validation in the ring.
Rolly Romero’s candid viewpoints articulate a deep skepticism about the true motivations behind the Crawford versus Canelo fight. Whether one agrees with him or not, his compelling analysis sheds light on the evolving landscape of boxing, where financial incentives often play a pivotal role in shaping matchups that were once deemed purely competitive on the basis of honor and legacy.
Leave a Reply